Artificial Intelligence in Life Expectancy Prediction: A Paradigm Shift for Annuity Pricing and Risk Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15680/g5f6y069Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Life Expectancy Prediction, Annuities, Machine Learning, Actuarial ScienceAbstract
This article explores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting life expectancy and its far-reaching implications for the annuities market. Traditional actuarial models, often reliant on demographic data and historical trends, face limitations in accuracy and personalization. We present a novel approach leveraging machine learning algorithms, including neural networks, decision trees, and ensemble methods, alongside natural language processing and deep learning techniques. Our AI-driven models integrate diverse data sources, including medical histories, genetic information, lifestyle factors, and socio-economic indicators, to provide more accurate and individualized life expectancy predictions. Using a dataset of anonymized health records and historical mortality data, we demonstrate that our AI models significantly outperform traditional actuarial tables in predicting individual mortality risks. The enhanced predictive power of these models has substantial implications for the annuities market, enabling insurers to price products more precisely, manage longevity risk more effectively, and optimize reserve capital. Moreover, consumers benefit from fairer pricing and personalized product offerings. This article underscores the need for regulatory framework revisions to accommodate AI-driven methodologies in actuarial practices. We also discuss ethical considerations, data privacy concerns, and the challenge of model interpretability, highlighting areas for future research to ensure responsible deployment of AI in life expectancy predictions and annuity pricing.
References
1. M. D. Hurd, P. Martorell, A. Delavande, K. J. Mullen, and K. M. Langa, "Monetary Costs of Dementia in the United States," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 14, pp. 1326-1334, 2013.[Online]. Available: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmsa1204629
2. F. E. Harrell Jr, K. L. Lee, and D. B. Mark, "Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors," Statistics in Medicine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 361-387, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4%3C361::AIDSIM168%3E3.0.CO;2-4
3. R. D. Lee and L. R. Carter, "Modeling and Forecasting U.S. Mortality," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 87, no. 419, pp. 659-671, 1992. [Online]. Available:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2290201
4. A. Esteva., "A guide to deep learning in healthcare," Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24-29, 2019.[Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-018-0316-z
5. Human Mortality Database. University of California, Berkeley (USA), and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany). Available at www.mortality.org or www.humanmortality.de (data downloaded on [date]).
6. T. Ching., "Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine," Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol. 15, no. 141, p. 20170387, 2018. [Online]. Available:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2017.0387
7. A. J. G. Cairns., "Modelling and management of mortality risk: a review," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, vol. 2008, no. 2-3, pp. 79-113, 2008. [Online]. Available:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03461230802173608
8. E. Vayena, A. Blasimme, and I. G. Cohen, "Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges," PLOS Medicine, vol. 15, no. 11, p. e1002689, 2018. [Online]. Available:
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689
9. M. Favaretto, E. De Clercq, C. O. Schneble, and B. S. Elger, "What is your definition of Big Data? Researchers' understanding of the phenomenon of the decade," PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 2, e0228987,2020. [Online]. Available: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228987
10. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), "Principles on Artificial Intelligence (AI),"August 2020. [Online]. Available: https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inlinefiles/AI%20principles%20as%20Adopted%20by%20the%20TF_0807.pdf
11. B. Goodman and S. Flaxman, "European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision-Making and a 'Right to Explanation'," AI Magazine, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 50-57, 2017. [Online]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741

