A Survey of Communication Protocols in IoT: MQTT, COAP, and Beyond

Authors

  • Raghunandan Shyam Phatak Junior Software Developer, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2025.0804002

Keywords:

Internet of Things (IoT), MQTT, CoAP, Communication Protocols, IoT Networks, Constrained Devices, Low Power Consumption, Scalability, Security, Emerging Protocols, HTTP/2, AMQP, LwM2M, IoT Architecture

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly revolutionizing industries and everyday life through the integration of smart devices, sensors, and networks. The ability to connect and communicate between these devices is vital for the effective functioning of IoT systems. As IoT devices vary widely in terms of their power, connectivity, and computational capabilities, communication protocols play a crucial role in ensuring seamless, efficient, and reliable communication. Among the most widely used protocols in IoT are MQTT (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport) and CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol), designed to address the specific requirements of IoT, including low power consumption, minimal bandwidth usage, and scalability.This paper surveys the key communication protocols used in IoT, with a specific focus on MQTT and CoAP. It discusses their architecture, characteristics, advantages, and limitations. Furthermore, the paper explores other emerging protocols that complement or extend the capabilities of MQTT and CoAP, such as HTTP/2, LwM2M, and AMQP, providing a broad perspective on the evolving IoT communication landscape.The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate the suitability of these protocols for different IoT applications, ranging from home automation and healthcare to industrial IoT (IIoT). We also highlight the security challenges associated with these protocols and suggest potential solutions. Lastly, we discuss future trends and the need for interoperability between different IoT communication protocols as IoT continues to scale and evolve.By analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of these communication protocols, this paper aims to provide IoT developers, researchers, and industry professionals with valuable insights into selecting the most appropriate communication framework for their IoT systems.

 

References

1. Bassi, A., & Pugliese, L. "IoT: Internet of Things," Springer.

2. Hunkeler, U., & Truong, H. L. "CoAP: A Lightweight Web Transfer Protocol for Resource-Constrained Devices,"

International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 7(3), 244–251.

3. K. Evans, et al. "Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) in IoT," IEEE IoT Journal, 4(3), 915-924.

4. Lakshmi Narasimha Raju Mudunuri, Vivekchowdary Attaluri, “Urban Development Challenges and the Role of Cloud AI-Powered Blue-Green Solutions,” in Integrating Blue-Green Infrastructure Into Urban Development, IGI Global, USA, pp. 507-522, 2025.

5. Wilding, M"The Role of MQTT in IoT Security," Journal of Applied Computing, 10(2), 143-158.

6. LwM2M Protocol Overview, OMA SpecWorks. https://www.openmobilealliance.org/.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

A Survey of Communication Protocols in IoT: MQTT, COAP, and Beyond. (2025). International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 8(4), 11013-11018. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2025.0804002