Pattern-Based Stream Enrichment and Aggregation Architectures for Low-Latency Financial Data Systems

Authors

  • Sriram Ghanta Staff Engineer, United States of America Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2019.0206003

Keywords:

Stream Processing, Financial Data Systems, Stream Enrichment, Stateful Aggregation, Data Stream Management Systems, Complex Event Processing, Low-Latency Architecture, Distributed Systems

Abstract

Modern financial data systems operate under stringent requirements of low latency, high throughput, fault tolerance, and correctness, driven by the real-time nature of market activity and regulatory oversight. Applications such as market data dissemination, fraud detection, real-time risk assessment, compliance monitoring, and settlement processing increasingly depend on continuous event streams rather than static datasets, as delayed or inconsistent processing can translate directly into financial loss or regulatory exposure. Within these environments, stream enrichment and aggregation form the computational core, integrating high-velocity event flows with reference datasets such as instrument metadata, customer profiles, and risk parameters, while producing higher-order insights through windowed, stateful, and temporal computations. This paper presents a pattern-based approach to stream enrichment and aggregation tailored specifically for financial systems, drawing on foundational data stream management systems (DSMS) such as Aurora and Borealis and extending their principles through modern distributed stream processing engines like Apache Flink. We systematically classify reusable enrichment and aggregation patterns, analyze their architectural and operational implications, and examine state management, fault recovery, and correctness guarantees under latency-sensitive workloads. By synthesizing early DSMS research from 2000-2005 with contemporary stream processing advancements from 2011-2018, the paper provides a structured and historically grounded framework for designing scalable, resilient, and maintainable financial streaming pipelines capable of meeting both performance and reliability demand.

References

1. Abadi, D. J., Ahmad, Y., Balazinska, M., Çetintemel, U., Cherniack, M., Hwang, J. H., … Stonebraker, M. (2005). https://cs.brown.edu/research/aurora/cidr05.borealis.pdf

2. Stonebraker, M., Çetintemel, U., & Zdonik, S. (2005). The 8 requirements of real-time stream processing. https://doi.org/10.1145/1107499.1107504

3. Babcock, B., Babu, S., Datar, M., Motwani, R., & Widom, J. (2002). Models and issues in data stream systems. Proceedings of PODS 2002.

https://doi.org/10.1145/543613.543615

4. Arasu, A., & Widom, J. (2004). Resource sharing in continuous sliding-window aggregates. Proceedings of VLDB 2004.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1316689.1316720

5. Kreps, J., Narkhede, N., & Rao, J. (2011). Kafka: A distributed messaging system for log processing. Proceedings of NetDB. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Kafka.pdf

6. Carbone, P., Katsifodimos, A., Ewen, S., Markl, V., Haridi, S., & Tzoumas, K. (2015). Apache Flink: Stream and batch processing in a single engine. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 38(4), 28-38.

https://asterios.katsifodimos.com/assets/publications/flink-deb.pdf

7. Akidau, T., Bradshaw, R., Chambers, C., Chernyak, S., Fernández-Moctezuma, R. J., Lax, R., … Whittle, S. (2015). The dataflow model. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 8(12), 1792-1803.

https://doi.org/10.14778/2824032.2824076

8. Cugola, G., & Margara, A. (2012). Processing flows of information: From data stream to complex event processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 44(3).

https://doi.org/10.1145/2187671.2187677

9. Daniel J Power, (2016). " Data science: supporting decision-making", pages 345-356. Available at doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2016.1171610

10. Salhi, H., Odeh, F., Nasser, R., & Taweel, A. (2017). Open source in-memory data grid systems. Proceedings of ICPE ’17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3030207.3053671

11. Sudhir Vishnubhatla. (2018). From Risk Principles to Runtime Defenses: Security and Governance Frameworks for Big Data in Finance. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17452405

12. Lakshman, A., & Malik, P. (2010). Cassandra: A decentralized structured storage system. ACM SIGOPS OSR, 44(2), 35-40.

https://doi.org/10.1145/1773912.1773922

13. Sudhir Vishnubhatla. (2016). Scalable Data Pipelines for Banking Operations: Cloud-Native Architectures and Regulatory-Aware Workflows. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17297958

14. Srikanth Chakravarthy Vankayala. (2016). Reframing Enterprise Quality Engineering: The Emergence of Predictive and Cognitive Automation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17839512

15. Jhala R, Majumdar R.. (2009). Software model checking. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592434.1592438

Downloads

Published

2019-11-12

How to Cite

Pattern-Based Stream Enrichment and Aggregation Architectures for Low-Latency Financial Data Systems. (2019). International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication, 2(6), 1822-1831. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2019.0206003