Risk-Weighted Optimization: Integrating Business Impact into Enterprise ML Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2024.0703010Keywords:
Machine Learning, Risk weight optimization, technical standpoints, Utility tradeoffAbstract
Machine learning (ML) models are commonly used in organizations to improve influence and make essential business decisions. These business decisions include credit approvals, fraud detection, resource allocation, and even access controls. In fact, typical ML training has a purpose that focuses on optimizations with statistical performance. These performances are quantified using measures such as accuracy, precision, or loss functions, which frequently neglect the asymmetric and context dependency in the binary risk, which is typically associated with prediction errors. Consequently, models that perform well from a technological standpoint may contribute to disproportionate financial, operational, or regulatory implications when deployed in a real-world enterprise system.
This paper provides a risk-weight optimization approach that is integrated into the company and has a direct impact on the ML training process. These frameworks give differential risk weights to ensure that predicted outcomes are based on the associated business repercussions. This will allow the models to prioritize decisions that have a high potential for impact on businesses. In reality, by incorporating domain-specific risk functions into the optimization targets, we will suggest a strategy that aids and aligns model behaviour with organizational risk tolerance and governance needs.
The simulation-based studies will be carried out using an enterprise-inspired dataset to give a comparison of loss-based training with risk weight optimizations. This would help to obtain an overall predicted accuracy that may show comparability, as well as risk-weight models that are significant in reducing high-impact errors and providing robust decisions in critical conditions. The visual analytics will need to include cost-effectiveness loss curves and risk-adjustment performance graphs. These will present an example of a technique that moves model behaviours toward business-aware decision-making.
References
1. Roy, C., Rautaray, S. S., & Pandey, M. (2018). Big Data Optimization Techniques: A Survey. International Journal of Information Engineering & Electronic Business, 10(4).
https://www.mecs-press.org/ijieeb/ijieeb-v10-n4/IJIEEB-V10-N4-6.pdf
2. Olier, I., Orhobor, O. I., Vanschoren, J., & King, R. D. (2018). Transformative machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03392.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03392
3. Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal of information management, 48, 63-71.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401219300581
4. Polyzotis, N., Roy, S., Whang, S. E., & Zinkevich, M. (2018). Data lifecycle challenges in production machine learning: a survey. ACM Sigmod Record, 47(2), 17-28.
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3299887.3299891
5. Wu, Y., Liu, L., Pu, C., Cao, W., Sahin, S., Wei, W., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A comparative measurement study of deep learning as a service framework. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15(1), 551-566.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8765795/
6. Boppiniti, S. T. (2019). Machine learning for predictive analytics: Enhancing data-driven decision-making across industries. International Journal of Sustainable Development in Computing Science, 1(3), 13.
https://www.academia.edu/download/120325781/586_722_1_SM.pdf
7. Shukla, P. (2017, September). ML-IDS: A machine learning approach to detect wormhole attacks in Internet of Things. In 2017 intelligent systems conference (IntelliSys) (pp. 234-240). IEEE.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8324298/
8. Chuvieco, E., Aguado, I., Jurdao, S., Pettinari, M. L., Yebra, M., Salas, J., ... & Martínez-Vega, F. J. (2012). Integrating geospatial information into fire risk assessment. International journal of wildland fire, 23(5), 606-619.
.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-022-00366-1

