INNOVATIVE RELIABILITY ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS FOR INTERNET-SCALE CLOUD CONSUMER PLATFORMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15680/a2r1x024Keywords:
Consumer platforms, Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), Microservices Architecture, Cloud Observability, Chaos Engineering, Service-Level Objectives (SLOs)Abstract
Consumer platforms, hosted on the internet cloud and catering to millions of users, offer extremely high quality and reliability. With the rapid adoption of downloadable services in myriad locations, old-fashioned reliability engineering practices may no longer be up to the “cloud” tasks. This paper discusses reliability engineering solutions architected for a large-scale cloud consumer platform. In the design of the solutions, focus has been given to architectural resilience, automated failure detection, monitoring of distributed systems and intelligent management of incidents. As demonstrated by the study, the modern reliability framework achieves minimal disruption and continuous delivery of service through the amalgamation of the microservice architecture, container orchestration and multi-region redundancy.
The paper analyzes the embedding of advanced monitoring systems and predictive analytics that allow a proactive indication and remediation of failure in the systems. To highlight how arranging can harden unit capacity in modified cloud circle reliability measures such as chaos engineering, fault injection testing, and self-healing infrastructure are analyzed.
Furthermore, it maintains observability, service-level objectives (SLOs), and error budgets for more reliable service quality on a globally distributed platform. This clause utilize construction models and shape of functional dependable to analyze technological approaches that enable scalable and elastic cloud consumer platforms. Combining automated reliability mechanisms with intelligent operational strategies improved the reliability and stability of the system while reducing downtimes and enhancing the user experience of a large-scale system.
References
[1] B. Beyer, C. Jones, J. Petoff, and N. Murphy, Site Reliability Engineering: How Google
Runs Production Systems. Sebastopol, CA, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2019.
[2] N. Krishnan and S. Dutta, "Cloud-native reliability engineering practices for large-scale distributed platforms," IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 42–50, 2020.
[3] M. Villamizar, O. Garcés, H. Castro, and L. Verano, "Infrastructure cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using microservice architectures," Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 162, pp. 110–124, 2020.
[4] L. Bass, I. Weber, and L. Zhu, DevOps: A Software Architect’s Perspective. Boston,
MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2020.
[5] J. Hamilton, "Reliability patterns for hyperscale cloud platforms," Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 38–45, 2020.
[6] A. Basiri et al., "Chaos engineering: Building confidence in system behavior through experiments," IEEE Software, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2019.
[7] P. Jamshidi, C. Pahl, and N. C. Mendonça, "Microservices: The journey so far and challenges ahead," IEEE Software, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 24–35, 2019.
[8] T. Chen and R. Bahsoon, "Self-adaptive cloud autoscaling for cloud-based services," IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 248–260, 2020.
[9] M. Fowler and J. Lewis, "Microservices architecture for scalable cloud applications," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2019.
[10] R. Buyya, J. Broberg, and A. Goscinski, Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2019.
